If you haven’t already checked this out – please do. A grassroots backlash to the “Waiting for Superman” movie that has received so much attention:
Archive for October, 2010|Monthly archive page
Do we need Superman?
In democracy, Education Policy, family-school relations, films for teacher education, high-stakes tests, NCLB, politics, professional development resources on October 12, 2010 at 4:16 pmThanks again to PS for sending this from NPR –
It’s a slightly critical review of “Waiting for Superman” – the documentary focused on failing public schools, the Knights in Shining Armour who can save them (School Reformers – with a capital S and R), and the villains who have destroyed them (teacher unions).
If you have already seen Waiting for Superman, I STRONGLY recommend “Race to Nowhere” – a completely different perspective on the problem of public schools – but also a documentary.
Some folks say Waiting for Superman is “pro-kids” but it creates heroes out of folks who keep pushing the kind of Reform that is destroying kids and childhood (excluding Geoffrey Canada, perhaps, who has a much more holistic perspective on what kids and families need – I have no idea where Canada stands regarding curriculum and assessment…).
Atlanta and Georgia on NPR for cheating accusations
In Education Policy, high-stakes tests, NCLB, politics, poverty on October 12, 2010 at 3:59 pmThanks to loyal reader PS for sending this link to me. Those of us in Georgia know that this has saturated our local newspapers for months on end, but now we’re a story on NPR too. High-stakes testing leads to desperation, especially when teachers and administrators are working with youth who have historically – for a variety of reasons – not performed well on standardized tests in schools.
This, by the way, is nothing new and doesn’t only happen in low income schools. Way back when Ohio was just starting the state required tests (I’m talking mid to late 90s here), I was teaching 2nd grade and a colleague give me a class set of books that “just so happened” to have the same story in it that was going to appear on the state test. We were teaching in a middle-class to affluent district, and there were no “high-stakes” involved.
I decided not to give the story to my students and told my colleague that doing so would be missing the point of the assessment – to actually try to learn something about how our students could perform independently on a new “reading task.” Of course, it’s much more complicated than that – tests create completely new contexts where information, knowledge, and understanding don’t always transfer. But imagine, there was this kind of pressure even when there WASN’T any pressure!
Fab interview with Bill Ayers…
In democracy, Education Policy, government, high-stakes tests, institutions, justice, politics, professional development resources, Standing up for Kids, teacher education, teacher education resources on October 4, 2010 at 6:58 pmThanks to TCS for sending this my way!